Task 22 Version 3 Some educators believe that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

This is the link to the model essay to help you work on collocations and some grammar. https://howtodoielts.com/ielts-essay-musical-instruments/ Model IELTS Essay: Education Some educators believe that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Many teachers feel that learning to play a musical instrument is an indispensable part of a student’s education. In my opinion, there are socioeconomic concerns with this tenet but it is still advisable overall. Detractors can easily argue not every child has access to the supportive environment required to learn an instrument. Firstly, a family might not have enough money if a child wants to learn piano or buy a quality guitar. There are also related expenses that include the fees for private lessons and other equipment. Added to this, they will need their parents to have enough time to drive them to and from rehearsals and recitals. At home, the entire family will have to listen to them practice and this could be contentious if there are a lot of people living in one home or a child shares their room with siblings or relatives. All these factors affect underprivileged children and place them at a decided disadvantage. Nonetheless, the above issues can be mitigated with more funding for schools and the developmental benefits of music outweigh all other concerns. Research has shown that in early development, physical changes take place in the brains of both children and adolescents. Some of these relate to music and children who take up an instrument, even if they quit later, have demonstrated improved cognitive flexibility and creativity in longitudinal studies across a variety of cultural backgrounds. Apart from the scientific grounding, it is also common sense that children will feel more fulfilled and derive a lot of joy from playing music. This can provide a boost to not only academics but also their long-term mental well-being. In conclusion, though policymakers will have to account for accessibility issues, learning an instrument is key for neurodevelopment. Schools, parents, and teachers should work together to ensure the best chances of success. Vocabulary https://howtodoielts.com/ielts-essay-musical-instruments/

Task 22 Version 2 Some educators believe that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task22 Version1 Some educators believe that every child should be taught how to play a musical instrument. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task21 Version3 Some people think that in order to produce a happy society, it is necessary to ensure that there is only a small difference between the earnings of the richest and poorest. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

https://writing9.com/text/5e3a53c6c9911c0011b28b7a Model essay (overall band score 7.5) Some people think that to produce a happier society is to ensure that there is only a small difference on the earnings of the richest and the poorest members. To what extent do you agree or disagree? There are people who believe that a happier nation is evaluated by a short gap of the income between the richest and the poorest people, but I do not agree with this point of view. I think that there are other factors contribute to the level of happiness of a society. To begin with, people would be happier if their needs met, especially in health care, education, infrastructure, and entertainment. Such essential needs are provided by the government, thereby the authority should be the one manages and has a fair system to use the income taxes received equally. Taxes, on the other hand, are contributed by the rich and the poor people, therefore a good tax system would help to reduce the gap and would make the community happier. For example, the wealthiest people would pay higher tax and the least poverty classes pay less amount. And, the government should use that money to pay back for the benefits of the whole nation by giving free access to healthcare, education or entertainment. On the other hand, shortening the gap of the income between the rich and the poor is not a good strategy because it could not make the world strive for a better. Firstly, if everyone gets the same amount of what they work for, no one wants to work harder and thinks differently. As a result, the country could not develop well because everyone has the same standards. Besides, people become lazier and more laid-back and that would not make people happier. In conclusion, I think the government plays a vital role in controlling the public money and helps society become happier by enhancing local tangibles, not by cutting the salaries between the richest and the poorest.

Task21 Version2 Some people think that in order to produce a happy society, it is necessary to ensure that there is only a small difference between the earnings of the richest and poorest. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task21 Version1 Some people think that in order to produce a happy society, it is necessary to ensure that there is only a small difference between the earnings of the richest and poorest. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task 20 Version3 In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

https://howtodoielts.com/ielts-essay-traditional-foods-and-fast-food/ IELTS Model Essay: Traditional Foods and Fast Food In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? The rise of fast food globally is often thought to have an injurious impact on families, individuals, and society at large. In my opinion, fast food is a negative overall despite some tangible benefits. The advantages of fast food vary according to the segment of society in question. Individuals get enjoyment out of fast food, the clearest evidence of which is its popularity. Fast food is also relatively cheap and, as its name suggests, saves time. For families, the advantages are similar. In many working-class families, parents spend at a lot time and energy at their jobs and do not have the luxury of preparing a nutritious, time-consuming meal for their children. Fast food is therefore a necessary, viable alternative. Finally, society benefits in a general sense because of the employment opportunities. Fast food restaurants employ thousands of, admittedly, lowly paid workers and is a safe transitional job for students and struggling individuals. Regardless, the negative impact of fast food is greater. Though people enjoy the taste and convenience of fast food, they are doing irreparable harm to both their short and long-term health. Research has shown that the high fat and sugar content in fast food not only affects daily energy levels but also contributes to conditions such as heart disease and diabetes. These same health risks extend to families, with the added caveat that children are forming potentially life-long bad habits. Society also suffers from the growth of the fast food industry as local businesses lose revenue to these international conglomerates that enrich primarily the already wealthy or foreign nationals. In conclusion, despite the benefits related to convenience and economics that fast food brings, the health drawbacks should serve as strong deterrents for countries looking to encourage these industries. Vocabulary https://howtodoielts.com/ielts-essay-traditional-foods-and-fast-food/ rise increase

Task 20 Version2 In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Task 20 Version1 In many countries, traditional foods are being replaced by fast food. This has a negative impact on families, individuals and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Plan for 5-10 minutes. Put your plan before your essay. Spend 30 minutes on writing.

Week 2 Short Story Analysis

Choose one of the stories and analyze. “Lamb To The Slaughter” By Roald Dahl​ “Pedestrian” by Ray Bradbury​ “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell​ “Survivor type” by Stephen King​ “Word Processor of the Gods” by Stephen King​ “The Black Ball” by Ralph Ellison​ “Miriam” by Truman Capote​ “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson​ “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut​ “Where Have You Gone, Charming Billy?” by Tim O’Brien​ “The Intruder” by Andre Dubus​ “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings” by Gabriel Garcia Marquez ​ "The Handsomest Drowned Man in the World" by Gabriel Garcia Marquez​ “Cathedral” by Raymond Carver ​ “The Rocking Horse-Winner” by D.H. Lawrence​ ​

Week 1 assignment “How might your perspective be similar or different from the one you’ve heard?

Instructions

1 – Choose the speech you’d like to listen to

2 – Listen to the speech (1-2 times) (YouTube)

3 – While listening try to recognize the speaker’s opinion on the topic and answer the question related to your video

5 – Answer the question “How might your perspective be similar or different from the one you’ve heard?”

6 – Publish your answer 

No.	Speaker	Topic	Question
1	Priyanka Chopra	“The Full Power of Women” (Education)	What is speaker’s viewpoint on gender inequality in education?
2	Will Smith	“How to Face Fear”	What is speaker’s viewpoint on fear?
3	Jordan Peterson	“The Guide to Successful Public Specking”	What is speaker’s viewpoint on successful public speaking?
4	Jordan Peterson	“The Great Advice to Every Student”	From the speaker’s perspective what is the best thing for students to do?

Week 1 assignment "The Art Of Disappearing” by Naomi Nye

Read a poem and answer for the following questions. 

Questions

1)What is the author’s intended message to the audience?

2)What is your perspective about this poem?

3)How might your perspective be different from that of others?

The Art of Disappearing

When they say Don’t I know you?
say no.

When they invite you to the party
remember what parties are like
before answering.
Someone is telling you in a loud voice
they once wrote a poem.
Greasy sausage balls on a paper plate.
Then reply.

If they say We should get together
say why?

It’s not that you don’t love them anymore.
You’re trying to remember something
too important to forget.
Trees. The monastery bell at twilight.
Tell them you have a new project.
It will never be finished.

When someone recognizes you in a grocery store
nod briefly and become a cabbage.
When someone you haven’t seen in ten years
appears at the door,
don’t start singing him all your new songs.
You will never catch up.

Walk around feeling like a leaf.
Know you could tumble any second.

Then decide what to do with your time.

retrieved on 04.09.2020  https://anthonywilsonpoetry.com/2014/07/22/lifesaving-poems-naomi-shihab-nyes-the-art-of-disappearing/